|
day 7
Oct 14, 2009 22:53:06 GMT -5
Post by metacom on Oct 14, 2009 22:53:06 GMT -5
what happen? I am disappoint.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 1:05:16 GMT -5
Post by metraxis on Oct 15, 2009 1:05:16 GMT -5
OMGLOLZORS died, Chalupa lived. We're now 3 bodies behind. We could take another run at MbM or Chalupa, but I'd rather get a more certain kill. Dunsel or Cakemeister seem like good lynch targets if we can get MbM to put off levi for one more day. Peeking at the day 6 thread, I'm seeing elegant master stroke type plans, and that seems to be when the muffin all of a sudden falls apart like in Spore 2. Since MbM seems to believe in me and in RP, we can present our target as 'an alternative to voting for levi for confirmed innocents'.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 13:43:22 GMT -5
Post by refinedpenguin on Oct 15, 2009 13:43:22 GMT -5
Chalupa is publically saying he can die. I don't want to off any unconfirmed innocents with our nightkill. I'm not sure who that leaves us if we also don't go for Chalupa or MBM.
...I tend to think we should try once more on Chalupa. Maybe that's foolish of me, but we don't want him scanning another of us.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 13:47:24 GMT -5
Post by metraxis on Oct 15, 2009 13:47:24 GMT -5
Are there any really confirmed innocents other than Mbm and Chalupa? I don't think Chalupa's really stupid enough to admit he's killable when he is. Since we're an odd number away from victory, it might not hurt to try though. On the other hand, if we kill someone unprotected tonight, then push for the levi lynch tomorrow, another random kill would be the last one we need, without ever offing either of them. That might also get around the likely 'lynch a muffin or lose' message we're likely to generate after tonight.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 13:50:30 GMT -5
Post by monkey66 on Oct 15, 2009 13:50:30 GMT -5
I'd be in favor of killing Chalupa.
Also, an idea: RP steals my role tonight Early tomorrow, someone pushes for my lynch. I can then claim that I'm not the Janitor tomorrow, which MbM will hopefully verify. If I get lynched anyway, RP jans my body and the confusion continues.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 13:51:48 GMT -5
Post by refinedpenguin on Oct 15, 2009 13:51:48 GMT -5
That's a hilarious plan, monkey, if it'd work.
Assuming Chalupa cannot protect himself AND scan, as he claims, killing him again would still be good for himself as it stops his scan.
I however believe him he can die now. I think Chalupa very easily could publically announce that without thinking.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 13:53:07 GMT -5
Post by metraxis on Oct 15, 2009 13:53:07 GMT -5
I'd be in favor of killing Chalupa. Also, an idea: RP steals my role tonight Early tomorrow, someone pushes for my lynch. I can then claim that I'm not the Janitor tomorrow, which MbM will hopefully verify. If I get lynched anyway, RP jans my body and the confusion continues. That depends on how the scan works. If we just keep killing unprotected innocents, we'll win the next day that an innocent or exploder gets lynched.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 13:57:53 GMT -5
Post by monkey66 on Oct 15, 2009 13:57:53 GMT -5
You mean lie detector?
I assume that MbM sends in an action to see if something posted in the thread is true or false.
But maybe I'm overthinking things. You seem to be manipulating the lynches fairly effectively.
Killing Chalupa still seems wise though. Too bad nobody picked Armorer.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 13:59:46 GMT -5
Post by refinedpenguin on Oct 15, 2009 13:59:46 GMT -5
If we just keep killing unprotected innocents, though, the list of unconfirmed will be contracted to the point they have no choice but to lynch us. Which we do not want.
I think we try for Chalupa again. If we get him, awesome, no more scans, the game is ours. If we fail, hopefully we foil his scan, and we know not to go for him again. I think its the more conservative option, because we don't reduce the pool of unconfirmeds. Until we reach the point of majority we want that pool to stay as large as possible.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 14:03:00 GMT -5
Post by metacom on Oct 15, 2009 14:03:00 GMT -5
I think trying to kill Chalupa again would be a fine idea--I'm in agreement with ToS here regarding the possibility of Chalupa publicly admitting he is unprotected now.
Also, it seems pakrat may be killed tonight rather than levi? That's convenient.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 14:10:20 GMT -5
Post by metraxis on Oct 15, 2009 14:10:20 GMT -5
Up to you metacom. I guess it all depends on whether Chalupa is protecteed which is the right move.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 17:22:38 GMT -5
Post by pubertybop on Oct 15, 2009 17:22:38 GMT -5
Stealing Chalupa's role tonight.
We disable him until we can kill him.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 17:22:55 GMT -5
Post by pubertybop on Oct 15, 2009 17:22:55 GMT -5
EDIT: Now that I think about it.. that might not be such a good idea.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 19:25:32 GMT -5
Post by leviwill on Oct 15, 2009 19:25:32 GMT -5
As being seen, theres a ratio of 6:9. There pushing off innocent deaths, so we need to hit someone random, that is not MBM, or Chalupa, as they are most likely protected. We dont need them dead, we need them to keep voting off innocents.
If either innocent dies, and our nightkill is successful the game becomes 6:7. Make a random dogpile on another innocent, or me, and its game.
|
|
|
day 7
Oct 15, 2009 19:28:02 GMT -5
Post by monkey66 on Oct 15, 2009 19:28:02 GMT -5
Chalupa's scans make it more likely that they hit a muffin. So we kind of need him dead.
|
|