|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 9:56:09 GMT -5
Post by refinedpenguin on Oct 10, 2009 9:56:09 GMT -5
Well, 2/3 announced roles are down. MBM seems likely to be protected, so I dunno how great a target he is for a nightkill. Leaving him around might even make people suspicious of him.
Who do we all think we can get lynched? I'd be so happy if it was MBM somehow.
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 10:32:20 GMT -5
Post by metraxis on Oct 10, 2009 10:32:20 GMT -5
She's probably only going to be protected for a day or two, or protected by a BG-type, since the roles we've seen so far tend to be limted in scope, so yeah, skip MbM for today and maybe tomorrow, and certainly nobody roleclaim the day after he finally does die..
Looking over the tally, blizzire got the most innocent votes yeasterday (pun intended), so he might be a good choice. On the other hand, it is only Day 2, so an innocent-on-innocent vote might make the choice easier for us.
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 10:37:49 GMT -5
Post by tso on Oct 10, 2009 10:37:49 GMT -5
If there's a protective role, then yeah, I'm pretty sure she'll be well protected if she can push for her innocence. I'm going to reread the stuff to see where it stands, but you may be right in keeping it off of her.
I'll get back to you on who to lynch.
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 11:01:31 GMT -5
Post by refinedpenguin on Oct 10, 2009 11:01:31 GMT -5
Oh, BTW, I was fed psychedelic cookies and have to say how happy I am in italics in every post, and I am quite so.
I suspect blizzire may be the cause.
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 11:07:26 GMT -5
Post by leviwill on Oct 10, 2009 11:07:26 GMT -5
Lol... I think it is Blizzire with his cookies. Im just refering it to my game, where he brought up aspect of the cookies. And if choosing our abilities was true, Blizzire made his ability like this.
Who is "she"? Or is ~ a girl?
In my eyes, we just need to lead to random innocents, seeing as its currently 16/7. And I think were doing a good job, making enemies out of each other.
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 11:53:33 GMT -5
Post by pubertybop on Oct 10, 2009 11:53:33 GMT -5
Omg guise I gonna die
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 12:00:16 GMT -5
Post by refinedpenguin on Oct 10, 2009 12:00:16 GMT -5
If you'd post something semicoherent for once you wouldn't, and then I'd be positively jumping for joy.
Honestly, RP, we killed you for being a moron for like the first two games you were in, then you improved and while still crazy managed to actually contribute, and now you've gone so far off the deep end you might as well be a trained chimp. You obviously are still capable of analytical thought, why don't you share it? It'd be especially nice now that you're muffin so that you can fake them out rather than just getting killed for being a moron.
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 12:02:06 GMT -5
Post by pubertybop on Oct 10, 2009 12:02:06 GMT -5
If I suddenly start making coherent sense, it'll look like an act of self-preservation, which will then lead to my downfall, and the subsequent downfall of anyone who's like "Omg don't kill him, he's making sense for once"
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 12:06:22 GMT -5
Post by refinedpenguin on Oct 10, 2009 12:06:22 GMT -5
*shrug* Considering how well being a clown worked yesterday for keeping votes off of you, I hardly feel you can do much worse by actually contributing. Moreover, you can do it in such a way as to not look defensive. If you do it in direct response to an accusation of idiocy, yes, it'll look defensive, but if you just quote someone's post and begin picking them apart (still RP style, but with easily understood points against them rather than arcane jabs that only those familiar with you can even hope to fathom) before anyone mentions how useless you are today, I think you can simultaneously prevent any new accusations that you are useless and endear yourselves to the masses by appearing helpful.
FYI, I'm exploding with positive vibes.
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 12:20:03 GMT -5
Post by crunch10000 on Oct 10, 2009 12:20:03 GMT -5
Any impediments that you get apply here as well.
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 12:22:04 GMT -5
Post by pubertybop on Oct 10, 2009 12:22:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 12:22:26 GMT -5
Post by refinedpenguin on Oct 10, 2009 12:22:26 GMT -5
I'm happy to know that.
Should I got back and edit already made posts here that were made today?
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 12:27:52 GMT -5
Post by crunch10000 on Oct 10, 2009 12:27:52 GMT -5
yes.
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 12:29:44 GMT -5
Post by refinedpenguin on Oct 10, 2009 12:29:44 GMT -5
I'm pleased to say I have completed the assigned task.
I am correct I am allowed to post normally aside from including a line about being happy, right? Aeon's PM to me didn't indicate an inability to speak, merely that every post must include a statement of happiness in italics.
|
|
|
Day 2
Oct 10, 2009 12:32:09 GMT -5
Post by pubertybop on Oct 10, 2009 12:32:09 GMT -5
I figured
|
|